Skip to content

Owner-chat review fixes: frozen task v3 evidence

Task: 554f0d9e-68fb-4805-ac8d-a59e289dd320, version 3. Execution: b7598e8c-ba1f-4102-b276-d4d745ebffb7. Repository: h8v6/heyaira; branch: heyaira/554f0d9e. Working directory for every command below: /Users/jablonskib/HeyAira-agents/.heyaira-worktrees/heyaira/554f0d9e-worker. Source and starting HEAD: afc79265022fcd175d4d2503c014e0e33be222f0. Initial git status --short returned no changes; origin was [email protected]:h8v6/heyaira.git. Starting parent: 02bcf736f1418de373174cc4e83d680a9148aa11. The MCP identity matched the supplied resource, instance and project; task_get(task_id, version=3) confirmed K1/K2/K3 and the overriding handoff. Subagents used: none.

Frozen methods

  • K1: python scripts/test_postgres.py <new tests> -p no:cacheprovider on afc79265 (with tests) and HEAD; RESULT states both.
  • K2: python scripts/test_postgres.py <files> -p no:cacheprovider -> exit 0. T2, T3, T5, the PR #234 suite and tests/test_decisions*.py, zero skips.
  • K3: git diff --name-only afc79265..HEAD and git merge-base --is-ancestor afc79265 HEAD: only src/heyaira/, tests/, docs/; source is an ancestor.

Change and confidence

The owner-chat path skipped the existing answer eligibility guard. Both modes now call decision_answers.check_action after loading/creating the target and before inserting the attestation. option.authorizes selects confirm or refuse; refusal does not reject conflicts. The existing transaction rolls back a new proposal when the guard rejects it. Existing boundary and replay order remain in place.

The binding-rejection path previously needed another pool connection while holding its original connection. The WriteBindingError handler now surrounds the transaction/connection context, so rollback and release finish before _reject_write writes its separately committed audit. Role, scope and principal checks still precede write-context validation.

Tests use synthetic data over authenticated MCP with the existing ASGI transport and real disposable PostgreSQL databases. T4 substitutes a real pool of exactly two connections and synchronizes two calls immediately before _reject_write. A five-second timeout verifies completion; a separate pool reads both committed audit rows and checks operation, error, outcome and target. Both connections must be idle afterwards and acquisition must finish within 0.5 seconds. The timeout path asserts both calls reached the barrier.

Actual base checks (before implementation)

At afc79265, with only the new regression file added:

python scripts/test_postgres.py tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t1_mode_one_conflict_rolls_back_proposal tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t4_invalid_context_audits_after_releasing_pool -p no:cacheprovider
exit 1
FAILED tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t1_mode_one_conflict_rolls_back_proposal
FAILED tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t4_invalid_context_audits_after_releasing_pool
2 failed in 8.57s

T1 failed at the assertion requiring an MCP error: result.is_error was False. The base accepted the second conflicting rule. T4 failed at await asyncio.wait_for(asyncio.gather(*calls), timeout=5) with TimeoutError.

After adding the timeout-path barrier-arrival assertion, still at the base:

python scripts/test_postgres.py tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t1_mode_one_conflict_rolls_back_proposal tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t4_invalid_context_audits_after_releasing_pool -p no:cacheprovider --tb=short
exit 1
FAILED tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t1_mode_one_conflict_rolls_back_proposal
FAILED tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t4_invalid_context_audits_after_releasing_pool
2 failed in 7.62s

T4 again raised TimeoutError, and its assertion that two distinct request IDs reached the rejection barrier passed. This demonstrates pool exhaustion rather than a barrier waiting for a missing second call.

An attempted edit using a shell here-document was denied: zsh:1: can't create temp file for here document: operation not permitted. No source edit occurred. The following command therefore ran on the base:

python scripts/test_postgres.py tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py -p no:cacheprovider
exit 1
4 failed, 1 passed in 8.78s

T1/T2/T3/T4 failed; T5 passed. The edit was subsequently applied using python -c in the authorized worktree, without installing or bypassing permissions.

Implementation working-tree checks

python scripts/test_postgres.py tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py -p no:cacheprovider
exit 0
5 passed in 3.18s
postgres_acceptance=passed: selected tests, zero skipped tests

git diff --check
exit 0, no output

The Apple /usr/bin/git launcher emitted denied xcrun-cache writes and Xcode event-stream warnings. Later Git commands invoke the already installed /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/git directly. This is a tool selection, not a permission expansion. The optional global Git ignore file was unreadable; the initial worktree status was still clean.

Committed HEAD checks

Implementation commit: 2c63120a0ab3079812fe8d6c46cdf0f65d5bac4c. Parent: afc79265022fcd175d4d2503c014e0e33be222f0. git status --short after committing returned no changed paths. Git's optional maintenance emitted Unable to create '.../.git/packed-refs.lock': Operation not permitted; the commit itself succeeded and its SHA/parent were read back. No history was rewritten. The evidence commit 855fe538c5bbeeaedf9fb34cf0577f8e6918cbb7 also succeeded, with parent 2c63120, despite the same maintenance warning when using git -c gc.auto=0 commit. This restriction did not prevent commits.

All commands in this section ran at implementation HEAD 2c63120:

python scripts/test_postgres.py tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t1_mode_one_conflict_rolls_back_proposal tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py::test_t4_invalid_context_audits_after_releasing_pool -p no:cacheprovider
exit 0
2 passed in 3.99s
postgres_acceptance=passed: selected tests, zero skipped tests

python scripts/test_postgres.py tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py tests/test_owner_chat.py tests/test_decisions*.py tests/test_schema_guard.py tests/test_mcp_runtime_contract.py -p no:cacheprovider
exit 0
177 passed in 386.12s (0:06:26)
postgres_acceptance=passed: selected tests, zero skipped tests

PYTHONPATH=src python scripts/export_mcp_contract.py --check
exit 0
MCP contract is up to date

PYTHONPATH=src python scripts/check_docs_contract.py
exit 0
documentation contract passed: 48 MCP tools covered

git diff --name-only afc79265..HEAD
exit 0
docs/reports/554f0d9e-owner-chat-review-evidence.md
src/heyaira/decision_owner_chat.py
tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py

git merge-base --is-ancestor afc79265 HEAD
exit 0, no output

git diff afc79265..HEAD --check
exit 0, no output

git diff afc79265..HEAD --stat
exit 0
3 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

The suite selection matches the PR #234 acceptance suite recorded in docs/reports/39b11a5a-owner-chat-evidence.md, plus all five review regressions. The glob includes test_decisions.py, test_decisions_e2e.py, test_decisions_holds.py and test_decisions_webauthn.py.

Criterion records

criterion_id: K1
outcome: pass
evidence_path: docs/reports/554f0d9e-owner-chat-review-evidence.md
feedback: The named PostgreSQL command failed T1/T4 on afc79265 (exit 1, 2 failed); both passed at committed implementation HEAD 2c63120 (exit 0, 2 passed, zero skips). T4 checks two synchronized rejections within five seconds, two committed audits, two idle connections and prompt acquisition.

criterion_id: K2
outcome: pass
evidence_path: docs/reports/554f0d9e-owner-chat-review-evidence.md
feedback: python scripts/test_postgres.py tests/test_owner_chat_regressions.py tests/test_owner_chat.py tests/test_decisions*.py tests/test_schema_guard.py tests/test_mcp_runtime_contract.py -p no:cacheprovider exited 0: 177 passed, zero skips, including T2/T3/T5 and the full PR #234 suite.

criterion_id: K3
outcome: pass
evidence_path: docs/reports/554f0d9e-owner-chat-review-evidence.md
feedback: git diff --name-only afc79265..HEAD exited 0 and listed only the three authorized paths above; git merge-base --is-ancestor afc79265 HEAD exited 0. Source is the implementation commit's direct parent. The follow-up commits only complete this evidence file.

Confidence: high, based on reproduced base failures, shared guard reuse and real MCP/PostgreSQL checks. No required check was skipped or left unrun. There are no unresolved blockers. Unrun: the unrelated complete repository suite and independent Bridge verification. No push, PR, merge, installation, deploy or production mutation was performed. Only this evidence document changes after the tested implementation commit; final SHA, parent, clean status and repeated scope/ancestry checks are recorded in RESULT/receipt.